AMNESTY INTERNATIONALPublic Statement
AI Index: ASA 20/017/2007 (Public)
India: Continued harassment of defenders of women workers’ rights and campaigners abroadAmnesty International is concerned by the continuing harassment of defenders of women workers’ rights in the garments export industry in Bangalore city in the southern Indian state of Karnataka, as well as associated campaigning activists based in the Netherlands. The harassment has included the filing of apparently false criminal charges against them, aimed at curbing their freedom of expression. Amnesty International is particularly concerned by arrest warrants issued in India against seven Netherlands-based activists of the Clean Clothes Campaign (CCC) and the India Committee of the Netherlands (ICN), on September 29. The activists travel frequently to India where they are at risk of arrest as a result of the charges against them. The activists have been part of an international campaign highlighting violations of labour rights of women workers in two garment export companies in Bangalore (Fibres and Fabrics International and its subsidiary Jeans Knit). Garments produced by these two industries are exported to the Netherlands and other countries in the West. Amnesty International understands that the practice of filing apparently unsubstantiated criminal charges against defenders of workers’ rights in several parts of India is not new, and that the Indian authorities have repeatedly failed to take action to prevent this practice. India, as a signatory to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), has specific obligations under Article 19 of the ICCPR to safeguard the peaceful exercise of the right to freedom of expression and association. Amnesty International is concerned that the harassment and intimidation aimed at these activists flies in the face of international human rights law. The organization urges the Government of Karnataka and India’s National Human Rights Commission to ensure that:
Background Subsequent to the filing of the charges in July 2006, these trade unions felt restrained from circulating reports of the above-mentioned violations. The filing of charges against the activists based in Netherlands is aimed at curbing the circulation of these reports in countries to which the companies’ garments are exported.
|